<< Back to Summary 
1. A faculty member is the editor of a textbook in her specialty, and receives a royalty based on the number of books sold. She requires all students in her course to purchase that textbook.
#Response DateComment
1.Tue, 3/13/07 10:51 PMIt depends on how relevant the textbook is to the topic. Is the author an authority on the topic? I would think it is a serious COI if there are NO equal textbooks available. The author could refuse royalty to lessen the COI.
2.Tue, 3/13/07 10:54 PMIf she allows other faculty to choose the textbook in an unbiased, anonymous manner, it could be required as what the facult deem as the "most appropriate" book. If she is involved in the decision, it is a serious COI
3.Tue, 3/13/07 11:00 PMThe only constraint might be if there were no other comparable textbooks available for this specialized course.
4.Wed, 3/14/07 12:08 AMIs there another option for the course? This can be slippery, but if an impartial educator would pick the book, then there may not be a problem.
5.Wed, 3/14/07 12:09 AMif it was the standard text prior to her taking over as editor, if it is recogized as the preferred text on the topic
6.Wed, 3/14/07 12:34 AMIf the text is recognized as "one of the best", and the faculty member fully disclosed the relationship, it would lini,ize the COI.
7.Wed, 3/14/07 2:52 AMon if the textbook is any good and if it useful for the course.
8.Wed, 3/14/07 12:05 PMThis is a widely accepted practice and there is some logic and benefit to the students since the textbook reflects how the faculty member teaches. This still feels like a serious conflict of interest.
9.Wed, 3/14/07 1:39 PMIs it the best tool for the course.
10.Wed, 3/14/07 1:50 PMWhether there are any other current texts on the same subject. If there are, this is a serious COI
11.Wed, 3/14/07 2:04 PMIs there any other comparable text for this particular specialty? Would the faculty member donate the royalties back to the university or to services for the students?
12.Wed, 3/14/07 3:56 PMHas the book been reviewed? Is it considered by general consensus to be at least one of the best textbooks for the specialty>
13.Wed, 3/14/07 6:04 PMIs it more economical for the students, is the text specific for the course and therefore the ideal resource, and unavailable in any other venue. Then the COI is minimal
14.Wed, 3/14/07 10:00 PMIf this is the only text available and it is clearly needed to teach the course I can see how thi smight not be a conflict.
15.Thu, 3/15/07 12:57 AMIt might be the only or by far best text in that particular area of specialization.
16.Thu, 3/15/07 4:56 PMMSU's new policy does not prohibit this, but wants departs/colleges to establish their own guidelines. I personally believe that it is a moderate conflict of interest that should be disclosed.
17.Thu, 3/15/07 8:14 PMIF no other equally good textbooks for that content then is ok.
18.Fri, 3/16/07 11:19 AMOn how good the text is and what else is available.
19.Mon, 3/19/07 12:03 AMIf he/she genuninely believes it is the best book that covers the material being taught.It is no different than students having to buy a course pack
20.Mon, 3/19/07 1:37 PMWhat other textbooks are available. If hers is the only one on the topic then no. If there are several then yes.
21.Mon, 3/19/07 4:32 PMThe potential for a COI clearly exists in this situation, but it is almost inevitable. The best textbooks are written by faculty and instructors who are active in teaching. One of the principle motivations for a teacher to write or contribute to a textbook is to create a textbook that is tailored to their course. Authors / editors can't be expected to do so unless they are appropriately rewarded by receiving royalties, so this creates a "Catch 22". on the other hand, this tends to be a minor COI, since for textbooks sales and royalties to be a significant financial factor, the text needs to be adopted and used by other institutions, where the COI doesn't exist. Therefore, this only really becomes an issue if a poorly written textbook is forced on a class by the instructor/author, presumably as a self-interested means to increase income. In such cases, the unit curriculum committee may have a role to correct the problem if they see evidence from the publisher / distributor that textbook sales are limited to a single instructor at a single institution.
22.Mon, 3/19/07 5:23 PMWe all have COI. The conflict is there. It is not an ethically disabling conflict if the textbook is the best thing available for the purpose.
23.Mon, 3/26/07 3:06 PMIf there is no other textbook that covers the material, and this is vetted through some advisory body. She could also figure out a way to not get royalty checks for the books that get bought by students. Unless those conditions are present, I would call it a serious COI
24.Mon, 4/23/07 1:21 PMThis is certainly a COI but if there are no other comparable works in the field it may be justifiable. It is not uncommon for faculty to require the purchase of materials they have produced.
25.Mon, 4/23/07 6:01 PMDepends if the book is very good or not. Also, students may be required to use a book but not necessarily purchase it.
26.Tue, 4/24/07 1:27 PMAre there other comparable texts available? If there is, I think this could be a moderate COI
27.Tue, 4/24/07 6:45 PMIf she is putting the royalty back into the department it is not a problem. She did the work why have them read some one else's book?
28.Tue, 4/24/07 9:26 PMIf it's the only or clearly best text it would be OK, but only with 3rd party (dept committee?)approval
29.Tue, 4/24/07 9:32 PMIf independent review found it to be the most relevent text, then may be appropriate.
30.Wed, 4/25/07 5:27 PMThe operative phrase is "she requires". If she does not require, but recommends it, then it is not a conflict of inteest. If she "reuires" it, then it is "AModerate COI"
31.Thu, 4/26/07 9:16 PMAvailability of competitive material and the relative quality would be an important issue. better the quality compared to others the less the conflict
32.Mon, 4/30/07 2:07 AMPlease see next answer.
33.Mon, 5/14/07 12:59 AMIf this is THE text as judged by peers not to reccomend this book would not be in the best interest of the students.